• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9747
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Sussex Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Environment
  • News
  • Business
  • Community
  • Sussex
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Environment
  • News
  • Business
  • Community
  • Sussex
No Result
View All Result
Sussex Bylines
Home News Brexit

Johnson’s Brexit deal: For richer or for poorer?

Juliet Lodge summaries reactions on Twitter to the last-minute Brexit deal agreed between the UK and the EU

Juliet Lodge by Juliet Lodge
28-12-2020 17:31 - Updated on 21-08-2023 16:07
in Brexit
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
Banksy does Brexit (detail). Image credit: dullhunk, licensed under CC BY 2.0

Banksy does Brexit (detail). Image credit: dullhunk, licensed under CC BY 2.0

When the Brexit trade deal was finally announced on 24 December, it was left to Ursula von der Leyen to deliver the last rites on Britain’s relationship with the EU. The EU Commission president expressed her hope for continuing friendship and cooperation between the UK and the remaining 27 nations of the EU.

From Boris Johnson barely a word before he scuttled off in search of sprouts. Later on Christmas Eve, back in Downing Street, he suggested the 1,250-page Brexit deal document would make excellent reading after the Christmas pud. It’s hard to imagine how he could have been less gracious and diplomatic.

Commentators on Twitter were quick to spot the PM’s fish tie as he posed in Brussels. It suggested he had netted a ‘good deal’ on fisheries. But trade emerged as the big issue. Were border controls across Europe to contain Covid a foretaste of things to come? Maybe. But what is already clear is that the early promise of frictionless trade has been abandoned. 

👍🇬🇧

"PM 'trolls' EU with fish-print tie after last min fishing wrangle before deal" https://t.co/kNciX8EC0p

— Andrea Jenkyns MP 🇬🇧 (@andreajenkyns) December 24, 2020

Twitter memes mocked the DTI’s ‘prepare for 1 January’ notices and suggested the deal is a litany of broken promises. The government was accused of self-imposed trade sanctions, deception over fishing and future impoverishment.

The deal, in the words of actor Stephen Mangan, is “better than no deal. In the same way that having your face gnawed off by a rat is better than having your face gnawed off by two rats.”

Former Conservative minister Stephen Dorrell dismissed the PM’s brag that there were “no non-tariff barriers to trade” as “jaw dropping”, noting that the whole purpose of the deal was to erect barriers that didn’t exist until now.

The claim by @BorisJohnson that there are "no new non tariff barriers to trade" in the EU Agreement is jaw dropping. The whole purpose of 2000 pages is to create barriers that do not exist today.

— Stephen Dorrell 🔸 (@stephen_dorrell) December 25, 2020

Lawyer, journalist and filmmaker Peter Stefanovi summed up the deal: “It’s cost the country £200bn, robbed British citizens of free movement, stripped our youth of the enrichment of Erasmus & made everyone but your millionaire chums poorer for years to come.” 

The PM’s announcement of the new ‘Turing scheme’ to replace the Erasmus programme was judged as more meanness towards England’s less better off young people, who have benefited hugely from the ability to study in the EU.

Tweets also focused on the reality of MPs having to vote this week after a one-day debate on a document that they will have barely had a chance to read and absorb.

Will have hours to look over the treaty next week. One day debate. Delayed till last minute to avoid scrutiny – the hallmark of this PM. The devil will be in the detail: certification, tariff rate quotas and rules of origin. #BrexitDeal pic.twitter.com/wLsw7x7nAh

— Matt Western MP 💙 🇬🇧🇨🇦 (@MattWestern_) December 26, 2020

What next? The PM’s upcoming party-piece – jingoistically ringing Big Ben at 11pm on New Year’s eve after MPs have ‘scrutinised’ the deal – is likely to add further fuel to the fire. And further justified contempt and mockery. It seems Johnson has chosen to forget how narrow that referendum vote was and how mired in controversy.

Meanwhile, there’s nothing to beat LedbyDonkeys ‘directory of deceit’, the JohnsonDossier.com, as the go-to New Year read; and German regional TV station NDR’s take on Johnson’s handling of negotiations: Brexnix, a send-up of The Crown.

Directory of deceit. Liar’s library. Call it what you will, but we've tracked down every word Johnson said and wrote during the 2016 referendum campaign. All 200k of them. They're here at https://t.co/0jyrHMShl2, a resource to hold him to account in the coming months and years

— Led By Donkeys (@ByDonkeys) December 24, 2020
Previous Post

From a dictator’s clutches to a ‘buddy’ helping those who flee

Next Post

Defending the rights of citizen journalists and campaigners

Juliet Lodge

Juliet Lodge

Juliet has worked as professor of European integration and EU politics in universities in New Zealand, the EU and UK. Her research spans biometrics, AI and EU affairs, on which she has given expert evidence to many parliaments and to the EU. She also worked as a freelance writer for newspapers both here and abroad. She was elected EU woman of Europe for her voluntary work with communities, and supports freedom of movement and EU reform.

Related Posts

Ireland flag
Brexit

The UK and Ireland – one in and one out of the EU

by Dorothy Smith
3 July 2026
big flag at the National Rejoin march
Brexit

Brexit ten years on – voices from the National Rejoin March

by Ginny Smith
28 June 2026
people protesting Brexit with image of Theresa May with an enormous nose with Brexit written on the side it spearing the UK
Brexit

Starmer is the latest prime minister to succumb to Brexit ailments

by James Joyce
25 June 2026 - Updated on 16 July 2026
March-for-Europe-2-July-2016
Brexit

Leaving the EU – ten years on

by Viv Griffiths
23 June 2026
Madeira airport
Brexit

Nightmare at the border: return flight ordeals for EU citizens living in the UK

by Viv Griffiths
24 April 2026
Next Post
Photo credit:立場新聞, via Wikimedia Commons

Defending the rights of citizen journalists and campaigners

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

Afghanistan Animal welfare Art Autobiography Biodiversity Brighton and Hove Christmas Citizenship Climate change Conflict Cost of living Covid-19 Eastbourne East Sussex Energy Equality Finance Food and drink Gaza Gender rights Hastings International Women's Day Lewes Local elections Media Music Nature Newhaven NHS Pollution Refugees Rewilding Schools Sewage Species survival Sport Sunday read Ukraine USA Walking Water pollution West Sussex Women Worthing youth
Sussex Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Sussex and beyond.

Sussex Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Newsletter sign up
  • Letters
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Network Map
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 Sussex Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9747

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
    • Democracy
    • Elections
    • Human rights
  • Environment
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health and care
    • Home affairs
    • Transport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Farming and fishing
    • Planning and housing
    • Science and technology
    • Trade
  • Community
    • Culture
    • History and heritage
    • Lifestyle
    • Sport and leisure
    • Travel and tourism
  • Sussex
  • World
    • Europe
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 Sussex Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9747