• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9747
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Sussex Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Environment
  • News
  • Business
  • Community
  • Sussex
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Environment
  • News
  • Business
  • Community
  • Sussex
No Result
View All Result
Sussex Bylines
Home News Health and care

Health workers, not ventilators, are our most precious resource

When breath becomes short, a patient won't turn to the politician, nor even the ventilator, for salvation, but to the healthcare worker

Himmi Kari by Himmi Kari
09-10-2020 09:38 - Updated on 21-08-2023 15:31
in Health and care
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
Picture credit: Colin D on Unsplash

Picture credit: Colin D on Unsplash, free for use

As the UK braces itself for round two of the coronavirus pandemic, the conversation has reverted back to subjects from earlier in the year. Perhaps to reassure the public that the second wave may not be as bad, the media touts the gains in hospital beds (or hospitals for that matter), and the amount of new equipment boosting the effort this time around.

During the first wave of the pandemic, ventilators were quickly heralded as the number one life-saving solution for the sickest coronavirus patients. The global rush for ventilators was so extreme that, despite quadrupling production, Dräger, one of the world’s leading manufacturers of the machine, could not begin to meet the demand. Subsequent development efforts involving big names like NASA and Dyson, as well as numerous smaller 3D printing companies, bolstered the world’s hope: by building and distributing enough ventilators, the ravages of this disease could be mitigated.

Unfortunately, it turned out that ventilators alone were not the solution.

As the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC) data from the first wave of the pandemic showed, the percentage of Covid-19 patients dying in UK Intensive Care Units (ICUs) after receiving mechanical ventilation was high – of the 10,812 patients admitted to British ICUs with coronavirus up to August 31, almost 40 per cent had died. And even before the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, mechanical ventilation was well known to cause complications, which led to clinicians being cautious about placing patients ‘on the vent.’ Add to this the virulence of Covid-19, and it was soon clear that ventilators were not the cure-all that the initial hype led us to believe.

What did improve outcomes, however, was good nursing.

Ventilators are complicated machines and require expert knowledge to be used effectively. Without a trained operator they are at best an inanimate object and, at worst, a potentially lethal device. Most of the time, the trained ventilator operator in an ICU is not the patient’s doctor, but their nurse. During the initial peak in the pandemic, junior doctors, newly seconded to ICU from other training posts, encountered a steep learning curve and did best when taking instruction from the nursing staff. Not only do these specialist nurses routinely adjust complicated ventilator settings, but they do so while managing myriad infusions, as well as attending to the various other care needs of their patients. Superheroes indeed. Which is why expanding the number of ventilators is to ignore the real limiting factor – adequate nursing numbers.

'Healthcare workers are the most precious resource in the NHS.' Photo credit: Luke Jones on Unsplash
‘Healthcare workers are the most precious resource in the NHS.’ Photo credit: Luke Jones on Unsplash, free for use

Healthcare workers are the most precious resource in the NHS. The oft-used phrase ‘lack of beds’ actually means ‘lack of staff’. A hospital can easily bulk buy enough beds to fill every empty room in the building, but without a concomitant reinforcement of staffing (and that means all healthcare professionals, from cleaner to consultant), expanding the quantity of medical equipment, be that beds or ventilators, is essentially futile.

Health systems only function when there are enough qualified workers to provide comprehensive, high-quality care. Every job, from sanitising the floor to emptying a catheter bag, is vital, so there should be as much focus on investing in healthcare workers as there is on procuring equipment, especially during a pandemic. Of course, there is much ground to be made up now, as years of NHS cuts and general dereliction by successive Conservative governments has led to an exodus of healthcare workers at every level.

The first and most pressing step in supporting the medical workforce during the current situation is ensuring its safety. Only with healthy teams can ongoing robust care be provided to the thousands of patients with coronavirus. The national shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE) and coronavirus testing for health workers at the start of the pandemic (with the latter still an ongoing issue) spoke to extreme deficiencies in policy and planning. The pleas for PPE from Drs Tun and Chowdhury, who later went on to die from coronavirus, were not only heart-rending, but showed the relative inertia of a government which only expanded testing for healthcare workers eight weeks after the first UK case.

In the longer term (unless there’s a deus ex pharmacia, COVID-19 will be on the agenda for months, if not years), healthcare staff will need ongoing nurturing. Before progress can be made, however, regressive actions must be reversed and that includes valuing nursing students enough to waive their tuition fees (abolishing student nurse bursaries was a punitive step taken by the government in 2017). Inflation-matching pay rises for public sector workers should also be on the agenda. Given that MPs have already led the way by voting for their own supra-inflation pay rise for 2020, why not (at long last) extend that to public sector workers? Money is not the only way to show appreciation, but it is one of the most fundamental, and when nurses have to turn to food banks, gross pay scale reform is critical. 

Remember, when breath becomes short, a coronavirus patient won’t turn to the politician, nor even the ventilator, for salvation, but to the healthcare worker. Pray that they are there.

Previous Post

Brighton’s cameo in Lisbon’s revolution

Next Post

Cold comfort for farmers in post-Brexit free-for-all

Himmi Kari

Himmi Kari

Himmi Kari is a medical doctor and freelance writer, with a particular interest in improving health inequalities. She is also a published travel writer and writes a monthly blog. Find @himmikari on Twitter and Instagram and read her blog at www.himmikari.com.

Related Posts

A newborn baby with mum
Health and care

Listening is part of safety: what three births taught me

by Kieran Simkin
8 September 2026
man looking exhausted
Community

The age of exhaustion

by Mick Channon
14 July 2026
Wheat crop with blue summer sky
Environment

Everything you wanted to know about the food system but were afraid to ask

by James Joughin
12 July 2026
River cruise
Health and care

My memory diary ends with a river cruise

by Jonathan Dutton
19 June 2026
Star reflection
Health and care

Entering the realm of fantasy – my memory diary goes off piste

by Jonathan Dutton
24 May 2026
Next Post
An Arizona feedlot. Beef from hormone-fed cattle like this could be coming our way after a UK-US trade deal. Photo credit: Jeff Vanuga, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service

Cold comfort for farmers in post-Brexit free-for-all

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

Afghanistan Animal welfare Art Autobiography Biodiversity Brighton and Hove Christmas Citizenship Climate change Conflict Cost of living Covid-19 Eastbourne East Sussex Energy Equality Finance Food and drink Gaza Gender rights Hastings International Women's Day Lewes Local elections Media Music Nature Newhaven NHS Pollution Refugees Rewilding Schools Sewage Species survival Sport Sunday read Ukraine USA Walking Water pollution West Sussex Women Worthing youth
Sussex Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Sussex and beyond.

Sussex Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Newsletter sign up
  • Letters
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Network Map
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 Sussex Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9747

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
    • Democracy
    • Elections
    • Human rights
  • Environment
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health and care
    • Home affairs
    • Transport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Farming and fishing
    • Planning and housing
    • Science and technology
    • Trade
  • Community
    • Culture
    • History and heritage
    • Lifestyle
    • Sport and leisure
    • Travel and tourism
  • Sussex
  • World
    • Europe
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 Sussex Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9747