• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9747
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Sussex Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Environment
  • News
  • Business
  • Community
  • Sussex
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Environment
  • News
  • Business
  • Community
  • Sussex
No Result
View All Result
Sussex Bylines
Home Politics

MP’s re-heated excuses over free school meals

Lewes MP Maria Caulfield tries to wriggle out of media storm over free meals for hungry kids

Mark Bullock by Mark Bullock
27-10-2020 15:44 - Updated on 25-08-2024 11:53
in Politics
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
Empty plate protests are taking off nationally. These were left outside the Southend offices of Tory MP Sir David Arness. Photo credit: Aston Line, Southend West Labour Party

These were left outside the Southend offices of Tory MP Sir David Amess. Photo credit: Aston Line, Southend West Labour Party

When Labour’s Deputy Leader Angela Rayner called a Tory MP ‘scum’ it was a gift to a party that likes to jump on any opportunity to play the victim. So it is with Lewes Conservative MP Maria Caulfield, who voted to oppose an opposition motion to extend free meals into the school holidays – but then says she is misunderstood.

Despite the categoric vote, and conscious of the weight of public opinion against her, Caulfield claims that free school meals is an issue that she has “always campaigned for, voted for and which I strongly support”.

There is little evidence of this. Her voice was noticeably absent in the Commons debate that preceded the vote last week.

What is on record is Caulfield’s voting history on other aspects of welfare and benefits. Of the 32 times she voted on such issues every single one was a vote against any increase. For someone who claimed in a Facebook post on October 22 that her ‘priority is helping those most in need’ she has voted 32 times out of 32 not to help them.

This recent vote makes that 33.

Caulfield wants to reassure us that “despite the headlines, the Government did not vote to end free school meals or vote against extending them to school holidays.“

But despite her claim, Caulfield and the government absolutely, categorically and unambiguously did vote against the motion.

.@mariacaulfield
I think you need to remove this as your pinned tweet. You voted AGAINST free school meals for the poorest children yesterday. #Lewes #FreeSchoolMeals https://t.co/wH51gZGjyF

— Laura (@Ladyrose1983) October 22, 2020

Shifting her ground, Caulfield goes on to claim that “the vote this week was specifically on the voucher system … we voted to continue providing free school meals but change the voucher system during school holidays to instead paying parents the money directly via their universal credit with £1,000 extra a year.”

But in mentioning Universal Credit along with the voucher system Caulfield is conflating two unrelated things. She would have been wise to have left it there.

She states that “as a replacement for the voucher scheme the government introduced a £1,000 a year extra UC payment on a weekly payment basis.”

However, the voucher scheme was announced around the 31 March, the extra Universal Credit payments were announced around the 20 March. Caulfield claims that the extra UC payments were set up to replace something that had not even been announced at that point.

In a Facebook post she lists other sources of funding the government has made available during the crisis, but as YouGov makes clear, that funding will sit alongside other support, not replace it.

Caulfield concludes that “this week I didn’t vote to scrap free school meals, I voted to end the voucher scheme and instead support giving extra money to parents via Universal credit instead.”

These words are carefully chosen, but it is her use of the word ‘instead’ which reveals the lie at the heart of what she is saying. The extra Universal Credit and money to councils is not ‘instead’ of free school meals: it is in addition to it, and I don’t believe that Caulfield would not know this.

Once again she is arguing against a point that no one has made and assuming the role of victim. The implication of her repeated insistence that she did not vote to scrap free school meals is that she is being unfairly treated.

She could argue that we can’t afford these meals, that it’s the parents’ responsibility, or that these families have already had lots of help. But instead she opts for a clumsy series of half-truths, misdirection, and outright lies.

I don’t doubt that when Caulfield says she cares about the vulnerable in society she genuinely means it. But what’s clear about her is that she will almost never go against the party line and if it comes to cutting benefits, well, she’ll do it.

Caulfield is a Conservative first and foremost and the party for her is always right. Perhaps that’s an admirable trait, and presumably Conservative voters would approve. But the Lewes MP represents the public at large, and irrespective of our political affiliation we deserve an MP who speaks openly, without obfuscation and misdirection, and who has the courage to tell us the truth even when it presents her in a light she does not find particularly flattering.

Lewes District Council has shared a list of organisations providing free meals locally. See their Facebook page. They include local football clubs as well as pubs – the Hampden Arms, and Kings Head – and a number of community centres and cafes.

Tags: Schools
Previous Post

The “party of business” fails the business test

Next Post

Code Six: the “new” standard for a zero carbon house is actually an ancient concept

Mark Bullock

Mark Bullock

Related Posts

Leeds City railway station
Business

Standards in public life matter

by Tom Serpell
3 September 2026
Greenfield land in East Sussex
Community

Changing the landscape in local government

by Alison Rees
1 September 2026
Jihad amongst the rubble of his house
Human rights

The struggle to survive in Gaza – Jihad’s story

by Bruce Smeath
28 August 2026
A university library
Culture

When the subject of racism becomes its evidence

by Odi Okaka Oquosa
27 August 2026
Five cheetahs in a field
Politics

Trump’s engine of extinction

by Ross McNally
21 August 2026
Next Post
cottage on the bank of a loch

Code Six: the "new" standard for a zero carbon house is actually an ancient concept

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

Afghanistan Animal welfare Art Autobiography Biodiversity Brighton and Hove Christmas Citizenship Climate change Conflict Cost of living Covid-19 Defence Eastbourne East Sussex Energy Equality Finance Food and drink Gaza Gender rights Hastings International Women's Day Lewes Local elections Media Music Nature Newhaven NHS Pollution Refugees Rewilding Schools Sewage Species survival Sport Sunday read Ukraine USA Walking Water pollution West Sussex Women youth
Sussex Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Sussex and beyond.

Sussex Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Newsletter sign up
  • Letters
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Network Map
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 Sussex Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9747

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
    • Democracy
    • Elections
    • Human rights
  • Environment
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health and care
    • Home affairs
    • Transport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Farming and fishing
    • Planning and housing
    • Science and technology
    • Trade
  • Community
    • Culture
    • History and heritage
    • Lifestyle
    • Sport and leisure
    • Travel and tourism
  • Sussex
  • World
    • Europe
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 Sussex Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9747