• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9747
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Sussex Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Environment
  • News
  • Business
  • Community
  • Sussex
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Environment
  • News
  • Business
  • Community
  • Sussex
No Result
View All Result
Sussex Bylines
Home Politics Elections

Can’t be bothered with voting? Think again

There may be good reasons why some people don’t do it, but Tom Serpell argues that it can make a difference and we all have a duty to vote

Tom Serpell by Tom Serpell
09-06-2023 02:22 - Updated on 01-08-2023 10:21
in Elections, Politics
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A
Polling station sign door

UK polling station. Photo credit: Elliott Stallion, Unsplash.

Can’t be bothered with voting? Think again. Look what happened over Brexit, when the country was wrecked at the misinformed behest of just 37 per cent of the electorate. Imagine what might have happened if more had voted!

Democracy means voting, like school means homework. It is what we all need to do for our own future. In a democracy, we theoretically have the opportunity not given to billions around the world, to select and remove those who make decisions on our behalf about how the country is run.

Despite this, engagement in politics in UK, one of the oldest of democracies, is at a low ebb. The economy and public services are in tatters. Membership of political parties totals less than 1 million. Readership of news media is in decline, leaving the people so ill-informed that most have neither interest in nor information on what laws are enacted, investments made with public money or who is appointed into positions of power. Public respect for politicians is low. Millions decide not to vote when given the chance.

The power of voting

Just take the recent local government elections here in East Sussex: turnout for Wealden was 36 per cent, with 53 per cent in the highest voting wards (Danehill and Fletching) but just 22 per cent in Hailsham East. 82,000 potential voters failed to vote, leaving all decisions up to the 46,000 who bothered. Those who did vote decided upon a picture of significant change, with the Conservatives losing control of the district council for the first time in 25 years; while the rest stayed at home, no doubt continuing to grumble about potholes, paying council tax, wanting their bins emptied, having views on how their communities are developed. If they do, why not vote?

And what about parliamentary elections? Do non-voters not pay income tax, VAT, national insurance? Do they expect defence, policing, courts, healthcare, transport systems, all to some extent reliant on tax revenue? If so, they should vote, yet millions do not. They expect others to do it for them. They fail to take responsibility. By not voting, they are like members of a football team, hoping that the number 9 scores while they do nothing.

Relegation no surprise
Also by Tom Serpell

Why are so many disengaged?

We can speculate on reasons for disengagement:

  • politics may be seen as someone else’s job;
  • low awareness/interest/education in politics;
  • mistrust or disgust in politicians’ perceived venality;
  • electoral system preventing votes delivering representation.

All perfectly valid but…taxation is surely one of the least popular manifestations of politics, yet we all (with the exception of some who are wealthy enough to pay accountants to save them the bother) pay them and benefit variably from them.

The one chance we have to influence our own or any tax is when we vote. “No taxation without representation” seems a fair demand when the current voting system results in millions being unrepresented in the House of Commons by virtue either of voting for a party that has no chance of winning in their home constituencies; or of not voting.

Voting is a duty, isn’t it?

Voting is the means by which we can express ourselves – at least in theory. This theory only really works if there is a fair voting system which allows representation in local authorities and/or Parliament of conflicting views. If such a system is to be allowed at last, the quid pro quo must surely be that every citizen must vote, confident that their shade of opinion will be represented. This can work. Compulsory voting has been practised in Australia for over a century and with considerable public support.

It is surely a duty on each enfranchised citizen at least to show up for elections. Even a spoiled paper is better than staying away, despite the current government’s efforts to disenfranchise progressive-minded voters with the introduction of voter ID – though that backfired on them in the recent local elections.

Those who object to compulsion should accept that if they want the right to vote for their own favoured liberties, all should share that right. To quote from Jolyon Maugham:

“People think they want things to be better but lack the inclination to take even the small risks to bring that change about. It is in the accumulation of acts of turning away, of refusing to take personal responsibility, that we create the conditions for bad things to happen and for the world to get worse.”

Jolyon Maugham

Voting is one small step we can and should all take, every time.

Previous Post

We want Britain’s rainforests back: the Tories prefer a nation of sheep

Next Post

Caroline Lucas: a tribute

Tom Serpell

Tom Serpell

Angry retired lefty living in rural Wealden. Lover of family, friends, drawing, most things Spanish and decent government. On Twitter @leftwithnoparty

Related Posts

Raised hands at a music event
Culture

Can we please have our music festivals back?

by Kiera McLean
15 October 2026
man sitting on the ground alone
Home affairs

The fear tactics of the far right: the demonisation of lone male migrants

by Maryam Panah
9 October 2026
Old door with three locks
Economy

The UK’s pension triple lock has done its job and needs to be retired

by Jonquil Lowe
8 October 2026
The word hate, repeated many times
Community

Hate lets us all down

by Tom Serpell
4 October 2026
A prayer stone on a rug.
Human rights

The US war on Iran: the funeral of a 12 year old girl

by Maryam Panah
2 October 2026
Next Post
Photograph of Caroline Lucas, smiling, on a bench by the Thames

Caroline Lucas: a tribute

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

Afghanistan Animal welfare Art Autobiography Biodiversity Brighton and Hove Christmas Citizenship Climate change Conflict Cost of living Covid-19 Eastbourne East Sussex Equality Finance Food and drink Football Gaza Gender rights Hastings International Women's Day Lewes Local elections Media Music Nature Newhaven NHS Pollution Refugees Rewilding Schools Sewage Species survival Sport Sunday read Ukraine USA Walking Water Water pollution West Sussex Women youth
Sussex Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Sussex and beyond.

Sussex Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Newsletter sign up
  • Letters
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Network Map
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 Sussex Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9747

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
    • Democracy
    • Elections
    • Human rights
  • Environment
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health and care
    • Home affairs
    • Transport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Farming and fishing
    • Planning and housing
    • Science and technology
    • Trade
  • Community
    • Culture
    • History and heritage
    • Lifestyle
    • Sport and leisure
    • Travel and tourism
  • Sussex
  • World
    • Europe
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 Sussex Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9747