• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9747
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Sussex Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Environment
  • News
  • Business
  • Community
  • Sussex
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Environment
  • News
  • Business
  • Community
  • Sussex
No Result
View All Result
Sussex Bylines
Home News Health and care

Covid hasn’t gone away – so why no plan B?

More Covid cases and fewer people wearing masks. What will it take for the government to move to Plan B?

Viv Griffiths by Viv Griffiths
03-11-2021 12:18 - Updated on 18-07-2023 16:43
in Health and care
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A
Mask wearing is becoming less common

Mask wearing is becoming less common... yet cases mount. Photo by engin akyurt on Unsplash

Ever since so-called ‘Freedom Day’ in July, when the legal requirement to wear face coverings in England ended along with other Covid regulations, the number of mask-wearers has dropped, even as coronavirus cases are on the rise again. This is most noticeable in my home town Brighton, where even staff in shops and banks are no longer bothering to wear a mask or provide hand sanitisers at the door, and public transport is more and more crowded with non-mask wearers. Small wonder that the number of Covid cases locally has shot up in recent weeks.

In contrast, friends who ventured back to Europe on holiday this summer report the widespread use of face covering indoors and compulsory Covid passes to enter restaurants and museums. Countries such as France, Italy, Germany and Portugal have all adopted these measures, apparently without fuss or undue opposition, and kept Covid cases low in comparison to the UK, where case numbers recently topped the 50,000 mark in one day. The UK now has the highest number of Covid cases in Europe and the fourth highest in the world. So why is the government still trumpeting Britain’s response to the pandemic as a success story and refusing to bring in a so-called plan B to tackle this worrying increase?

‘One of the UK’s worst ever public health failures’

A recent searing report by a group of cross-party MPs on the handling of the coronavirus pandemic calls it “one of the UK’s worst ever public health failures.” It criticises the government for initially adopting a herd immunity approach, delaying lockdowns and border closures, failing to protect vulnerable people in care homes and running an unsuccessful test and trace programme. A sense of “British exceptionalism,” “groupthink” and a “fatalistic approach” hampered the government’s and scientists’ responses to the pandemic, compared to many south-east Asian countries which had previous experience of Sars and Mers and adopted early protective measures that kept case numbers low.

Falling behind in vaccinations

Despite the UK’s early success with the development and rollout of vaccines, which is praised in the MPs’ report, at least 11 countries in Europe have now overtaken Britain in Covid vaccination rates. For instance, 79% of the Spanish population are now fully vaccinated compared to 67% in the UK.

There has also been a very slow rollout of the vaccine booster programme. There is currently a growing shortfall between the numbers of people eligible for a booster vaccination and those who have received one – only half of the over-80s so far. Information about how to obtain booster jabs has been hard to come by and at present rates it would be spring 2022 before everyone eligible has had a third vaccination, with the concern that those most vulnerable will be unprotected during winter.

The government continues to argue that “vaccines are our best line of defence” against Covid, while many thousands remain unvaccinated, and the evidence of rapidly rising cases and increasing deaths shows that vaccines by themselves are insufficient.

Many children left unprotected

Although Covid infections in England are still highest among school-age children aged 7-11, the government has been pursuing what Dr Pam Jarvis calls a “mass herd immunity experiment” with young people. This relies on the fact that most children only experience mild symptoms. The UK has only recently started vaccinating 12-15-year-olds, whereas Denmark and Spain have vaccinated most of their child population.

Whilst it was clearly important for children to return to school in the autumn, after over a year of interrupted education, very few protective measures were introduced to offset the removal of bubbles and mask wearing. Initial findings from the Children and Long Covid study indicate that one in seven children still have symptoms up to 15 weeks later. The new Secretary of State for Education, Nadhim Zahawi, only reluctantly conceded that schools could authorise absences for vulnerable children after pressure from groups such as the Good Law Project. Most schools are still waiting for airflow monitors which were promised months ago.

No Plan B yet… what will it take?

The Health Secretary, Sajid Javid, recently announced the government’s Plan B, that might be introduced in England to prevent “unsustainable pressure” on the NHS. These additional measures would consist of a return to compulsory mask wearing, some kind of Covid passports and working from home. Yet this would only bring England in line with the restrictions still in place in the other countries of the UK. Unlike England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland have kept the requirement to wear face coverings. In Scotland and Wales, Covid vaccine passes are required when attending nightclubs or large events.

On October 26, 263 Covid-related deaths were announced, the highest figure since March 2021. Yet Downing Street continues to assert that there are still no plans to introduce Plan B measures, despite calls to do so by the British Medical Association (BMA), scientists and trade unions. The government is delaying a decision, hoping that half-term will act as a fire break on infections.

This feels like déjà vu. We have been there before several times in the last 18 months, with delays leading to more severe restrictions because of Boris Johnson’s gung-ho attitude. What is the betting that we will have a Plan C before long? Let’s hope not.

Previous Post

At COP26 in Glasgow: the view from the streets

Next Post

Climate change? There’s a ‘them and us’ gulf at COP26

Viv Griffiths

Viv Griffiths

Viv Griffiths is a retired teacher and academic, specialising in gender and education research. Over the years, she’s also worked as an actor, gardener, librarian and wholefood shop partner. She is Emeritus Professor of Education at Canterbury Christ Church University. Viv is now a volunteer gardener in Brighton's Preston Park, a Friend of Hollingbury and Burstead Woods and singer with Brighton Voices. A regular writer for Sussex Bylines, she is also a member of the editorial team.

Related Posts

Old door with three locks
Economy

The UK’s pension triple lock has done its job and needs to be retired

by Jonquil Lowe
8 October 2026
A newborn baby with mum
Health and care

Listening is part of safety: what three births taught me

by Kieran Simkin
8 September 2026 - Updated on 12 September 2026
man looking exhausted
Community

The age of exhaustion

by Mick Channon
14 July 2026
Wheat crop with blue summer sky
Environment

Everything you wanted to know about the food system but were afraid to ask

by James Joughin
12 July 2026
River cruise
Health and care

My memory diary ends with a river cruise

by Jonathan Dutton
19 June 2026
Next Post
Ruth Miller of Alaska's Curyung Tribe.

Climate change? There's a 'them and us' gulf at COP26

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

Afghanistan Animal welfare Art Autobiography Biodiversity Brighton and Hove Christmas Citizenship Climate change Conflict Cost of living Covid-19 Eastbourne East Sussex Equality Finance Food and drink Football Gaza Gender rights Hastings International Women's Day Lewes Local elections Media Music Nature Newhaven NHS Pollution Refugees Rewilding Schools Sewage Species survival Sport Sunday read Ukraine USA Walking Water Water pollution West Sussex Women youth
Sussex Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Sussex and beyond.

Sussex Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Newsletter sign up
  • Letters
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Network Map
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 Sussex Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9747

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
    • Democracy
    • Elections
    • Human rights
  • Environment
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health and care
    • Home affairs
    • Transport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Farming and fishing
    • Planning and housing
    • Science and technology
    • Trade
  • Community
    • Culture
    • History and heritage
    • Lifestyle
    • Sport and leisure
    • Travel and tourism
  • Sussex
  • World
    • Europe
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 Sussex Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9747