• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9747
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Sussex Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Environment
  • News
  • Business
  • Community
  • Sussex
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Environment
  • News
  • Business
  • Community
  • Sussex
No Result
View All Result
Sussex Bylines
Home Community

Tree felling in Hollingbury Woods – “mistakes were made”

Brighton and Hove City Council admit to lack of communication about woodland work

Viv Griffiths by Viv Griffiths
23-03-2025 07:00
in Community, Environment, Sussex
Reading Time: 7 mins read
A A
Hollingbury Woods after tree felling

Hollingbury Woods after tree felling. Photo credit: Friends of Hollingbury and Burstead Woods.

In recent weeks, regular walkers in Brighton’s Hollingbury Woods have been distressed to see hundreds of trees being felled and the woodland left almost unrecognisable from the damage. Residents have described it as “shocking” and “heartbreaking”.

Widespread felling of ash trees, due to ash dieback, has been taking place across Brighton and Hove over the past few months and the city council has been severely criticised for the way that the work has been managed.

Ash dieback: a deadly disease

Ash dieback (ADB) is a fungus affecting ash trees in the UK, particularly across the south-east of England. First causing the leaves and shoots to wilt and die, the disease eventually affects the whole tree.

Young trees seem more susceptible than older ones, and though there are hopeful signs that some ash trees may be resistant, it is estimated that up to 80% of all ash trees across the UK may eventually be impacted by ADB, causing devastation to the landscape.

Widespread concerns about the woodland work

While many people, including myself, were aware of the spread of ADB and the need for some diseased trees in local woodlands to be felled for safety reasons, it has been very upsetting to see the extent of the work.

Questions have been raised about whether so many trees needed to be felled and whether healthy trees have also been chopped down unnecessarily, especially as the contractors are allowed to sell off the felled trees. Other trees and pathways through the woods have been left with considerable damage too, all just at the start of the nesting season.

In contrast to previous tree felling in Hollingbury Woods carried out in winter 2003/4, which was done more sensitively and mainly by hand, large machinery was used in the recent work, giving rise to more extensive damage and mess. A representative from the council’s city parks department said: “As this essential public safety work concludes on this site, an assessment on the impact to paths will be made and the Council will work with the contractor to address the damage done.”

In addition, serious concerns have been raised by local residents and community groups about the way that the council has gone about the work and the lack of communication about it. There were inadequate notices or signage in Hollingbury Woods, which meant that some people were unaware of the work taking place.

There has also been poor communication to residents and relevant community groups. For example, local conservation group Friends of Hollingbury and Burstead Woods (FHBW) were not informed when the felling work was due to start, so had to change a work session venue at short notice. Furthermore, they were not informed about an initial meeting which was held by the council’s aboriculture specialist (initially just for councillors) to explain the reasons for the work and address local residents’ concerns after these were first raised.

Damage to pathways and other trees.
The use of heavy machinery to carry out the ash dieback work caused considerable damage to woodland pathways. Photo: Friends of Hollingbury and Burstead Woods.

A public meeting was held to address concerns

The number of questions raised about the woodland work was so considerable that Brighton and Hove council decided to hold a public meeting about it at Hove Town Hall on 17 March. 

At a packed meeting, Director of Culture and Environment Chenine Bhathena explained that they were “dealing with an epidemic” of ADB and apologised that “steps were missed” in communicating the work to the public. The council had considered closing areas of woodland instead of felling trees, but decided this was not a practical option.

Head of Operations Robert Walker defended the use of heavy machinery in the woods for safety reasons, as diseased ash trees are very unstable, so work by hand could be dangerous (despite this having been done in the previous year).

The sale of chopped wood had offset £60,000 of the project’s costs, so no profit was made, though some of those attending were not satisfied at this explanation.

The council gave assurances that they would work more closely with local residents and groups in the future, stating: “We need to review how this next round of works has gone. We accept there are fundamental bits wrong with it.”

FHBW committee members Lesley Brown and Karen Johnston commented afterwards: “The whole thing has been very poorly handled because a lot of people feel very passionate about it. The fact they came and gave a public apology was really necessary.”

Some residents were not satisfied with the explanations given by the council. Bill Hicks thought it felt like “lip service”, adding: “There was no concern shown that they are still engaged in the mass felling of trees, including healthy ones, in bird nesting season.”

Cherry plum trees planted on the edge of Hollingbury Woods.
Friends of Hollingbury and Burstead Woods recently planted a number of cherry plum trees on the edge of Hollingbury Woods. This is just the start of replanting varied tree species to replace the felled ash trees.
Photo credit: Friends of Hollingbury and Burstead Woods

So what now for the local woodland?

City parks representative Lorcan Mannning reported: “Council officers are working with the contractors and visiting the site daily. Specialist smaller machinery has been brought in to further reduce the impact to the paths. Today’s report from site is that the ground is drying out and following the completion of extraction, (expectation is this week) the path will be cleaned from mud and debris, with an inspection carried out once all works have completed.” This work has now been undertaken and this has already made a big improvement. 

Friends of Hollingbury and Burstead Woods, who have been managing the woods since the great storm of 1987, are now planning to work with the council to replant trees and restore the paths. Group secretary Gill Taylor explained:

“Lessons will be learned from this and to make the woods more resilient a greater mix of species will be planted to increase biodiversity. This means that if a disease attacks in the future the impact to the tree canopy will not be so noticeable.

“With more light now reaching the ground we expect to see an increase in the wildflowers whose seeds have lain dormant: this will attract bees, butterflies and other insects to the woods.”

The group (of which I am a member) has already made a positive start in planting cherry plum trees in one of the woodland bays.

Let’s hope that lessons have been learnt at the council and that any future work to manage ADB or elm disease is handled more sensitively and with better communication.

For further information, see Friends of Hollingbury and Burstead Woods Facebook on: https://www.facebook.com/FriendsofHollingburyandBursteadWoodsinBrighton

Creating a wildlife pond in Brighton woodland: a great community project  
Also by Viv Griffiths

CLICK HERE TO DONATE TO OUR CROWDFUNDER

HELP US BECOME STRONGER SO THAT WE CAN CONTINUE TO DELIVER POWERFUL CITIZEN JOURNALISM!

Tags: Brighton and HoveNature
Previous Post

A Musky cloud is choking the USA

Next Post

A sweet farewell to ‘Rose of Mercy’

Viv Griffiths

Viv Griffiths

Viv Griffiths is a retired teacher and academic, specialising in gender and education research. Over the years, she’s also worked as an actor, gardener, librarian and wholefood shop partner. She is Emeritus Professor of Education at Canterbury Christ Church University. Viv is now a volunteer gardener in Brighton's Preston Park, a Friend of Hollingbury and Burstead Woods and singer with Brighton Voices. A regular writer for Sussex Bylines, she is also a member of the editorial team.

Related Posts

Bayeux Tapestry Scene 21.png -  Photo credit: Wikimedia CommonsUniversité de Caen Normandie · CNRS · ENSICAEN    Public Domain,
Culture

The Powerful Woman Missing from the Bayeux Tapestry : Matilda of Flanders

by Natasha Hodgson
10 September 2026
The_Escape_book
Culture

The Escape – a book review

by Alex Turpie
6 September 2026
Bags of discarded goods on a pavement
Environment

The broken circle, what nature knows about enough

by Oak Bear
5 September 2026
Brighton's Food Hall Kitchens
Community

A sustainable future : Changing the food system in Brighton

by James Joughin
4 September 2026
Greenfield land in East Sussex
Community

Changing the landscape in local government

by Alison Rees
1 September 2026
Next Post
a photo of Frank Carter making a funny face

A sweet farewell to 'Rose of Mercy'

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

Afghanistan Animal welfare Art Autobiography Biodiversity Brighton and Hove Christmas Citizenship Climate change Conflict Cost of living Covid-19 Eastbourne East Sussex Energy Equality Finance Food and drink Gaza Gender rights Hastings International Women's Day Lewes Local elections Media Music Nature Newhaven NHS Pollution Refugees Rewilding Schools Sewage Species survival Sport Sunday read Ukraine USA Walking Water pollution West Sussex Women Worthing youth
Sussex Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Sussex and beyond.

Sussex Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Newsletter sign up
  • Letters
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Network Map
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 Sussex Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9747

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
    • Democracy
    • Elections
    • Human rights
  • Environment
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health and care
    • Home affairs
    • Transport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Farming and fishing
    • Planning and housing
    • Science and technology
    • Trade
  • Community
    • Culture
    • History and heritage
    • Lifestyle
    • Sport and leisure
    • Travel and tourism
  • Sussex
  • World
    • Europe
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 Sussex Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9747