• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9747
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Sussex Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Environment
  • News
  • Business
  • Community
  • Sussex
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Environment
  • News
  • Business
  • Community
  • Sussex
No Result
View All Result
Sussex Bylines
Home Business Economy

Decisions have consequences: The people behind the choices that affect us all

From Eden to Starmer, the questionable thought processes that have impacted society…

Tom Serpell by Tom Serpell
09-12-2025 07:00
in Economy, History and heritage, Politics
Reading Time: 7 mins read
A A
Big Ben over the river Thames

Big Ben over the River Thames. Credit: Getty images for Unsplash

This country is in a bad way. Some causes for this, such as Covid or Trump, were unavoidable. Others are the direct legacies of decisions taken by those chosen to make them on our behalf. Sometimes, despite all of the resources made available to advise and assist, such decisions are disastrous.

Suez, for example, has often and rightly been cited as a pivotal disaster with long-term consequences. PM Anthony Eden made decisions secretively to undertake a military venture which went badly, without the knowledge or support of key allies. He handed a triumph to the very leader he aimed to challenge, with consequent, long-lasting damage to Britain’s trade and reputation. This was almost 70 years ago, so not closely associated with our current woes. With that being said, which and whose decisions have got us into the mess we are now experiencing? 

Margaret Thatcher and the 1980 sale of council houses

Thatcher’s decision to increase home and thus asset ownership by selling council houses to occupants was popular, but the ability for local authorities to use the proceeds from the sales to build replacements was expressly curtailed. Social housing availability was decimated. Today, supply of new houses is beyond the means of authorities and many would-be tenants are deprived of decent homes. Housing, especially properties affordable to the lower-paid, remains in short supply, inflating the cost of buying or renting beyond the means of millions. A wretched legacy.

Tony Blair and the 2003 Iraq war

Blair did much good in his premiership but the decision to participate with George W. Bush’s USA in the invasion of a sovereign nation doing no harm to UK on spurious grounds was and remains a scar on this country’s reputation. The impacts on stability in the region have endured, with millions of lives lost and affected. Trust in government has been seriously eroded as must our international reputation have been. Unforgiveable.

David Cameron and the 2016 EU referendum

Photo by Alexander Andrews on Unsplash

 A smooth and apparently reliable pair of pedigree hands made it all the more egregious when Cameron naively sought to take the steam out of the damaging debate about UK membership of the EU, not by offering a consensually agreed process appropriate to such a momentous issue, but by a simple majority referendum with few safeguards against its railroading by destructive forces. The Brexit result and subsequent implementation have been and still are disastrous for the economy, for industrial sectors needing the rejected workers, for the country’s reputation and alliances, as well as individuals’ lives.  

Boris Johnson and the ruination of the Tory Party

Filling the vacuum at the top of the Conservative Party and the country to carry out the decision of the Brexit referendum with the loudest media darling of the time was a huge mistake. Those who made it, the Conservative Party, suffered decimation at his hands as he weeded out those who might disagree with his methods and committed the rest to become a xenophobic, obedient rump of little talent. His tenure was marked by venality, self-seeking and lies. His successors, serially drawn from the swamp he left behind on his ejection, have lacked the stature and competence required. His selection was a disaster for party, country and trust in politics.

Keir Starmer and Zionist bias

Israel. Credit: Getty Images for Unsplash

Starmer has selectively attacked racism in the UK. He excluded from his party representatives of Islamic communities and pro-Palestine MPs, while building his appeal on a campaign against antisemitism. He lent underhand military support to the genocide of Palestinians by Israel’s pariah government. This ethnic bias has polluted his responsibility to the Labour Party and wider electorate, failed his humanitarian duty and shamed the nation.

I separate these decision-makers into responsible leaders whose arrogance led them to make one [or more] dreadful mistake [Thatcher and Blair]; and leaders who should not have been given their roles, had there been a more rigorous selection process and larger pool of candidates [the rest].  

To the outstanding examples selected I would add the decision of Chancellor Osborne instigating austerity, also under the aegis of Prime Minister Cameron, keeping millions in poverty, poor housing and dwindling public services. This policy, refreshed by his successors, has been cruel and counter-productive already for 15 years, affecting the lowest paid disproportionately and the wealthy not at all.

It may not escape your notice that several of those nominated, unhumbled by the consequences of their decisions on countless lives, still swan around coining it with nary a backward glance. To quote economist Thomas Sowell: “It is hard to imagine a more stupid or dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong.”

Cumulatively, these decisions have damaged our economy, international standing and trust in formerly reliable political parties. They have opened the door to populist, high-risk alternatives. What a gamble we all take when we vote for individuals who may one day make decisions on our collective behalf. How much do we ever know about the candidates named on the ballot-paper? What measures can parliament employ to rein in mistakes?

Where we mark our cross on election day is a decision to take seriously.  

To be or not to be – a democracy 
Also by Tom Serpell

CLICK HERE TO DONATE TO OUR CROWDFUNDER

HELP US BECOME STRONGER SO THAT WE CAN CONTINUE TO DELIVER POWERFUL CITIZEN JOURNALISM!

Previous Post

We want our country back: Fix Brexit to fix Britain. No tax rises required!

Next Post

Zack Polanski: The Green leader giving hope to the left

Tom Serpell

Tom Serpell

Angry retired lefty living in rural Wealden. Lover of family, friends, drawing, most things Spanish and decent government. On Twitter @leftwithnoparty

Related Posts

A newborn baby with mum
Health and care

Listening is part of safety: what three births taught me

by Kieran Simkin
8 September 2026
The_Escape_book
Culture

The Escape – a book review

by Alex Turpie
6 September 2026
Leeds City railway station
Business

Standards in public life matter

by Tom Serpell
3 September 2026
Greenfield land in East Sussex
Community

Changing the landscape in local government

by Alison Rees
1 September 2026
Juliska - Dukla's stadium
History and heritage

Dreams of Dukla

by Alex Turpie
30 August 2026 - Updated on 31 August 2026
Next Post
Zack Polanski

Zack Polanski: The Green leader giving hope to the left

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

Afghanistan Animal welfare Art Autobiography Biodiversity Brighton and Hove Christmas Citizenship Climate change Conflict Cost of living Covid-19 Eastbourne East Sussex Energy Equality Finance Food and drink Gaza Gender rights Hastings International Women's Day Lewes Local elections Media Music Nature Newhaven NHS Pollution Refugees Rewilding Schools Sewage Species survival Sport Sunday read Ukraine USA Walking Water pollution West Sussex Women Worthing youth
Sussex Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Sussex and beyond.

Sussex Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Newsletter sign up
  • Letters
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Network Map
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 Sussex Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9747

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
    • Democracy
    • Elections
    • Human rights
  • Environment
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health and care
    • Home affairs
    • Transport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Farming and fishing
    • Planning and housing
    • Science and technology
    • Trade
  • Community
    • Culture
    • History and heritage
    • Lifestyle
    • Sport and leisure
    • Travel and tourism
  • Sussex
  • World
    • Europe
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 Sussex Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9747