• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9747
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Sussex Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Environment
  • News
  • Business
  • Community
  • Sussex
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Environment
  • News
  • Business
  • Community
  • Sussex
No Result
View All Result
Sussex Bylines
Home Politics Democracy

Do we need county councils as well as district and borough councils?

Could the creation of unitary councils in Sussex benefit local residents and also reduce government costs?

Vic Ient by Vic Ient
23-07-2024 07:20 - Updated on 24-08-2024 16:34
in Democracy, Sussex
Reading Time: 7 mins read
A A
Large building

West Sussex County Council Building. Image by N.Chadwick https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0

Bluntly, we have too many layers of local government in England.  

Merging the layers could result in significant savings for the Government. Back in 2020, analysis by the County Councils Network (CCN) revealed that single ‘unitary councils’ could reduce costs by more than £3bn over five years.

Different layers of administration

In my local area in Sussex, we have four layers of councils:

  1. The Lewes Town Council (equivalent to parish council in rural areas)
  2. Lewes District Council
  3. East Sussex County Council (and East Sussex Fire Authority)
  4. South Downs National Park Authority

On top of this, we have other bodies, such as the NHS, Transport for the South East (TfSE), Environment Agency, which concerns itself with issues such as the pollution in our rivers. Then there is National Highways responsible for motorways and trunk roads which run through the area, and the Sussex Police Commissioner. The role of Commissioner superseded the County Council Police Authority. Of all these bodies, only the Commissioner role is elected, all the others are managed by non-elected bodies. Oh, and in addition, some areas have ‘Combined Authorities’, which have elected mayors in addition to county and district councils!

We could do with slimming down some of these public bodies. The logical place to start is by abolishing county council and district councils and moving to a unitary council. It would get rid of some of the anomalies, such as highway maintenance being with the county, but road sweeping being the responsibility of district councils. Also, we currently have the silly situation that county councils are responsible for waste disposal and recycling, whereas district councils are responsible for waste collection and recycling!

The rise of unitary authorities

Both county and district councils rely heavily on the national government to fund local services. That won’t change. Services would just be delivered by the unitary council in East Sussex and the unitary council in West Sussex. This would reduce the number of councils from 14 to two, aside from Brighton & Hove City Council, which is already a unitary authority.

I’m not talking through my hat. According to the Office for National Statistics (ONS) there were 59 unitary authorities in England in 2022. This includes several former county councils, such as Cornwall, Dorset, Wiltshire and Somerset.

Services that would be combined are:

  • Housing
  • Education
  • Adult Social Care
  • Transport and traffic safety
  • Road maintenance
  • Planning
  • Fire and public safety
  • Libraries
  • Rubbish and waste collection
  • Recycling collection
  • Waste disposal
  • Trading standards
  • Register of Births, Deaths and Marriages.
  • Council tax collections

In praise of unitary authorities

Eliminating county councils in favour of unitary authorities can be justified on several grounds related to efficiency and streamlining governance, improving service delivery and increasing adaptability and ensuring modernisation.

Efficiency and streamlined governance

  1. Simplified Decision-Making: the need for co-ordination between county and district councils can lead to delays and bureaucratic inefficiencies. A unitary authority consolidates all local government functions into a single entity, streamlining decision-making processes.

  2. Reduced Bureaucracy: merging the two tiers of local government could result in reduced administrative costs, fewer layers of management and a more direct line of communication and accountability.

  3. Economies of Scale: shared services, such as IT systems, human resources, and procurement, can be more efficiently managed under a single authority.

  4. Lower Administrative Costs: a unitary authority would reduce administrative costs such as salaries for councillors and senior managers, office space and support services thus freeing up resources for frontline services.

Improved service delivery

  1. Consistent and Integrated Planning and Delivery: services such as transport, housing, education, and social care can be more effectively planned and delivered when managed by a single authority. This integration can lead to better outcomes and a more strategic and equitable approach to addressing local needs.

  2. Clear Lines of Accountability and Transparency: in a two-tier system, residents may be unsure which council is responsible for certain services, leading to confusion and frustration. A unitary authority provides a single point of contact for all local government issues, making it easier for residents to know where to get help. In turn, voters can hold their unitary authority more clearly to account for the quality of local services and overall governance.

Adaptability and modernisation

  1. Flexibility in Governance: unitary authorities are better positioned to adapt to changing circumstances and needs. They can implement reforms and innovations more quickly without the need for extensive coordination between different levels of government.

  2. Focused Strategic Vision: a single authority can develop and implement a coherent strategic vision for the area, aligning economic development, infrastructure projects, and social services more effectively than a fragmented two-tier system.

Initial challenges but better outcomes?

In summary, eliminating county councils in favour of unitary authorities can bring about significant benefits in terms of efficiency, cost savings, service delivery, accountability, and adaptability. While the transition may involve initial challenges and costs, the long-term advantages of a streamlined and unified local government structure can outweigh these concerns, leading to better outcomes for residents and more effective governance.

Could the Lewes to Uckfield railway line reopen?
Also by Vic Ient

CLICK HERE TO DONATE TO OUR CROWDFUNDER

HELP US BECOME STRONGER SO THAT WE CAN CONTINUE TO DELIVER POWERFUL CITIZEN JOURNALISM!

Tags: Local governance
Previous Post

“Better than the Famous Five”: exploring the hidden tunnels of South Heighton

Next Post

Different chairs at the table: does representation go beyond the optics?

Vic Ient

Vic Ient

Vic Ient is a retired IT and telecoms project manager. He's an environmentalist, writer, hiker & biker, supporter of the ‘underdog’ and fair play, keen to protect our world’s natural countryside, cultural and historical heritage. He campaigns for preserving the beauty, tranquillity and diversity of the countryside, use of renewable energy and the reduction of polluting emissions. In Sussex he campaigns with SCATE and CPRE Sussex and is a volunteer at the South Downs Network.

Related Posts

red and blue caps on the ground
Community

Crowborough update: How brave patriot commandos saved a quiet town from zero crimes

by Concerned of Crowborough
16 October 2026
waist pipe on a beach
Environment

Seven hours and the questions Southern Water still hasn’t answered

by Mick Channon
13 October 2026
A bridge over the river Ems
Environment

The citizen scientists protecting a precious chalkstream

by Immy O Keefe
1 October 2026
An oak tree in a sunny field
Environment

What if the tree has rights too?

by Mick Channon
24 September 2026
The Mall in London full of people and flags
Democracy

The Establishment–in–waiting: Reform UK’s possible impact on British democracy

by James Joyce
22 September 2026
Next Post
Rachel Reeves, Keir Starmer, Angela Rayner

Different chairs at the table: does representation go beyond the optics?

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

Afghanistan Animal welfare Art Autobiography Biodiversity Brighton and Hove Christmas Citizenship Climate change Conflict Cost of living Covid-19 Eastbourne East Sussex Equality Finance Food and drink Football Gaza Gender rights Hastings International Women's Day Lewes Local elections Media Music Nature Newhaven NHS Pollution Refugees Rewilding Schools Sewage Species survival Sport Sunday read Ukraine USA Walking Water Water pollution West Sussex Women youth
Sussex Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Sussex and beyond.

Sussex Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Newsletter sign up
  • Letters
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Network Map
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 Sussex Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9747

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
    • Democracy
    • Elections
    • Human rights
  • Environment
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health and care
    • Home affairs
    • Transport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Farming and fishing
    • Planning and housing
    • Science and technology
    • Trade
  • Community
    • Culture
    • History and heritage
    • Lifestyle
    • Sport and leisure
    • Travel and tourism
  • Sussex
  • World
    • Europe
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 Sussex Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9747