• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9747
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Sussex Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Environment
  • News
  • Business
  • Community
  • Sussex
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Environment
  • News
  • Business
  • Community
  • Sussex
No Result
View All Result
Sussex Bylines
Home News Brexit

So, after all the promises: is Brexit really done?

Dorothy Smith reflects on the impact on our lives of leaving the EU – concluding that the present Brexit disputes will be never-ending

Dorothy Smith by Dorothy Smith
09-12-2021 13:47 - Updated on 18-08-2023 19:20
in Brexit, Politics
Reading Time: 7 mins read
A A
White on red anti-Brexit placards attached to railings next to a road. They have slogans such as 'We already have the best deal' and 'Brexit: Not going well, is it?'

Not going well, is it? Photo credit: John Cameron / Unsplash

In the light of all the propaganda, no doubt some people were persuaded by the slogan’Get Brexit done’, to change their vote at the last general election, imagining that, after Brexit, things would change for the better. 

On the day the UK officially left the EU, 31 January 2020, Britain’s exit was presented by Boris Johnson as a personal triumph.  The Prime Minister predicted the country could make Brexit a “stunning success”, which he considered “not an end but a beginning“.  At the end of the transition period, a last-minute post-Brexit deal to outline the future relationship between the EU and the UK was signed on 30 December 2020.  This was applied provisionally from 1 January 2021 and entered into force on 1 May 2021.

However, in October, far from economic gain, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) predicted that Brexit’s long-term hit to the British economy would be double that of the Covid pandemic, causing a huge “4 per cent reduction in long-run potential productivity.”  The OBR also expected a large hit to trade, as total UK imports and exports will “eventually be 15 per cent lower than had we stayed in the EU.”

So far, not impressed

Perhaps not surprisingly, a recent YouGov poll  found that 64 per cent of voters think the government is managing Brexit badly. 

So what did the Trade and Cooperation (TCA) deal, which replaced our EU membership, amount to?  As explained by the Institute for Government, it covered much wider areas of policy than just trade, being made up of three pillars:

  • A free trade agreement covering the economic and social partnership, including transport, energy and mobility.
  • A framework for cooperation between law enforcement and judicial authorities across civil and criminal matters.
  • An overarching governance arrangement, which will allow for cross-retaliation across different economic areas.

There were also a number of joint declarations, including on co-operation for financial services, and participation in EU programmes. 

What about standards?

The agreement offers virtually nothing on services, recognition of standards, or freedom of movement for young people and skilled workers.  Neither does it include an agreement on agri-food products, which are normally subject to checks at the EU border. 

The continued threats by Johnson’s chief Brexit negotiator Lord Frost to renege on the Northern Ireland Protocol (also part of the TCA accord) have effectively stalled the implementation of many of the potentially beneficial aspects of the TCA deal.  Some examples are given below.

For most businesses, the promise of tariff- and quota-free access to the EU’s single market for goods, claimed as a “win” by Brexiteers, has proved to be an illusion, as non-tariff barriers remain. These depend on meeting complex rules of origin on the amount of local content required.  Some industries, especially food, are simply unable to do this. 

Goods: All businesses have to examine their supply chains to check that they meet percentage thresholds for content. For example, cars must contain no more than 45% of materials coming from outside the UK or EU.  After a transition period ends in 2026, electric cars will not qualify for tariff-free trade if their batteries were imported from outside the UK/EU.

Huge hit to the City

Financial services: These make up around 7% of the UK economy.  Brexit has been described by the Financial Times as a “slow bleed” and a “huge hit to the competitiveness and global relevance of the City.”  More than 440 institutions have moved part of their business or set up hubs within the eurozone, shifting assets equivalent to 10% of the UK banking system, as the EU refrains from granting “equivalence” or market access decisions to key segments of the UK sector, to reduce what Commissioner Mairead McGuinness called “this risky over-reliance on a third country.”

Science and Research: Under the TCA, the government was set to fund full UK association with the EU’s 100bn Horizon research programme, at a cost of £6.9bn over four years.  This has been held up by political friction over the Northern Ireland Protocol.  Even arch eurosceptic Bill Cash complained: “British research institutions remain frozen out of key projects and funding despite agreement on participation.” 

Burdened by red tape, Sussex businesses see no way out of Brexit nightmare

Data Protection: The UK government has signalled its own approach to data protection, which will focus more on the economic and social opportunities from the harnessing of data, rather than the associated privacy risks. A Financial Times leading article warned that this could remove vital safeguards, such as human checks on decisions made by computer algorithms.

Security and Policing: The UK will continue to be able to consult the European Criminal Records database, but will not have access to the Schengen Information System on which police forces circulate alerts on movements of criminals. As a third country, the UK can no longer participate in the European Arrest Warrant. London has negotiated a substitute arrangement, but a drop in the number of people extradited would signal a problem.

Brexit is never-ending

What Brexit really means for the UK is a series of interminable disputes on practically all fronts with its largest trading partner, which has an economy nearly six times larger.  Whatever the Brexiteers want to claim about being “sovereign equals”, the EU is a supra-national body with much greater power and weight in the world economy and the UK stands to lose far more in any disagreement, both materially and in terms of its global reputation.

Britain, alone, risks becoming an irrelevance on the world stage. 

Brexit has compounded the economic impact of the pandemic at home and, as has been made clear by the new German coalition and is an unwelcome distraction for EU leaders from major global challenges, such as the threat of dangerous climate change and escalating tensions with both China and Russia.

The Brexiteers’ fantasies about “global Britain” are finally coming home to roost. Under this administration, Britain will never be global and Brexit will never be done.  We are condemned to never-ending acrimonious negotiations with those who should be our closest friends and allies.

Previous Post

When eating’s a problem… surviving the feasting season

Next Post

Schools and Covid-19: the government is letting us down

Dorothy Smith

Dorothy Smith

Dorothy has been involved in the energy and telecoms sectors for many years, working with EU institutions in Brussels. She was previously the private secretary to a Labour cabinet minister. Returning to the UK in 2005, she settled in a small village at the foot of the South Downs and is partner in a Whitehall-based think-tank focusing on public policy issues.

Related Posts

Raised hands at a music event
Culture

Can we please have our music festivals back?

by Kiera McLean
15 October 2026
man sitting on the ground alone
Home affairs

The fear tactics of the far right: the demonisation of lone male migrants

by Maryam Panah
9 October 2026
Old door with three locks
Economy

The UK’s pension triple lock has done its job and needs to be retired

by Jonquil Lowe
8 October 2026
The word hate, repeated many times
Community

Hate lets us all down

by Tom Serpell
4 October 2026
A prayer stone on a rug.
Human rights

The US war on Iran: the funeral of a 12 year old girl

by Maryam Panah
2 October 2026
Next Post
A boy earring a Covid mask sits on some school steps

Schools and Covid-19: the government is letting us down

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

Afghanistan Animal welfare Art Autobiography Biodiversity Brighton and Hove Christmas Citizenship Climate change Conflict Cost of living Covid-19 Eastbourne East Sussex Equality Finance Food and drink Football Gaza Gender rights Hastings International Women's Day Lewes Local elections Media Music Nature Newhaven NHS Pollution Refugees Rewilding Schools Sewage Species survival Sport Sunday read Ukraine USA Walking Water Water pollution West Sussex Women youth
Sussex Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Sussex and beyond.

Sussex Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Newsletter sign up
  • Letters
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Network Map
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 Sussex Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9747

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
    • Democracy
    • Elections
    • Human rights
  • Environment
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health and care
    • Home affairs
    • Transport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Farming and fishing
    • Planning and housing
    • Science and technology
    • Trade
  • Community
    • Culture
    • History and heritage
    • Lifestyle
    • Sport and leisure
    • Travel and tourism
  • Sussex
  • World
    • Europe
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 Sussex Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9747