• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9747
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Sussex Bylines
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Environment
  • News
  • Business
  • Community
  • Sussex
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Environment
  • News
  • Business
  • Community
  • Sussex
No Result
View All Result
Sussex Bylines
Home News Environment

The US election and the environment – our writers review the result (part two)

Two of our regular writers express their concerns about Trump’s victory on climate change and the environment

Ross McNally by Ross McNally
11-11-2024 07:00 - Updated on 22-02-2025 11:36
in Environment, World
Reading Time: 7 mins read
A A
Stormy seas on the Curacao coast

Stormy seas ahead. Image by Paul from Pixabay

Given the enormous significance of the US election result, not only for America itself but for us in the UK and the rest of the world, we will be devoting a number of articles in the coming week to the implications of Trump’s victory.

We asked our regular writers to write a brief piece sharing their reactions to the election outcome, and we have compiled their responses into three articles, covering, broadly, the implications for the UK; for the politics of climate change and the environment; and for immigrant communities and Ukraine.

This is the second in the series, and we will be publishing the third piece tomorrow (Tuesday).

Trump doesn’t give a damn about the future of the world – Ross McNally

Trump’s victory this week, bolstered by Republican control of the Senate and probably the House of Representatives too, augurs environmental calamity on a global scale. His flagrant climate denial and disregard for the living world likely close the window of possibility for limiting global heating to 2°C above pre-industrial levels.

The US is among the top emitters of greenhouse gases in the world, both nationally and per capita. As such, it’s vital that the next administration is laser-focused on the transition to net zero, by leaving fossil fuels in the ground, investing in clean energy and public transport, and reducing the production and consumption of meat and dairy. Trump has made clear his intentions to do precisely the opposite, doubling down on oil production as well as destroying other environmental regulations preventing the pollution of air and water, as he did during his first term.

Trump has always been upfront about the fact that he doesn’t give a damn about the world in which your children and future generations will have to live. This isn’t merely a question of skinny polar bears, but of major crop failures in the world’s breadbasket regions, mass migration of hundreds of millions of people due to drought, deadly heat, natural disasters and associated conflicts. Unfortunately, demagogues like Trump, who even his former chief of staff John Kelly said met the definition of a fascist, may continue to do well out of this.

Electoral politics has failed for decades to avert the greatest existential crisis we face as a species. This latest result affirms that failure. The only hope now for preventing the worst of the climate and ecological disaster is direct action and civil disobedience the world over. In Trump’s America, that will require courage and solidarity.

Is there such a thing as a ‘green capitalist’? Dale Vince’s recent campaigning suggests not
Also by Ross McNally

The prospect of the most powerful man on earth being a climate change denier is terrifying – Dorothy Smith

The clear victory of Donald Trump is depressing for all of us who dread the consequences of a right-wing US regime likely to be characterised by both racism and sexism. However, the most important impact of the next Trump administration will be its inevitable drag on the efforts to achieve a global transition to clean energy, with dangerous implications for climate change and for human life on this planet.

The US is the world’s largest economy and, unsurprisingly, the second biggest emitter of greenhouse gases, after China, with India and the countries of the EU in 3rd and 4th place. The UN Environment Programme, in their Emissions Gap report published in October 2024, found that “countries must deliver dramatically stronger ambition and action in the next round of Nationally Determined Contributions, or the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C goal will be gone within a few years.”

The Trump campaign threatened that, if re-elected, he will once again pull the US out of the Paris climate change agreement, causing UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres to warn of a “crippled” Paris accord. According to Politico, a draft executive order has been prepared that would remove the US from the entire UN framework of global climate negotiations, which could do lasting damage to efforts to limit global heating.

Trump has also promised to reverse key elements of President Joe Biden’s green policies, including yet unspent funds under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). However, Andy Brown, of Orsted, a UK investor in offshore wind and President of the UK Energy Institute, speaking on the BBC Today programme on 7 November, noted that much of this funding was creating jobs in Republican states and that during Trump’s last period as President, solar and wind power in the US had actually increased by 66%. 

Reuters appeared to confirm that “a Biden-era law providing a decade of lucrative subsidies for new solar wind and other clean-energy projects would be near-impossible to repeal…thanks to support from Republican states. They had previously reported that most of these grants will be spent by the time the Trump administration takes office.

There are, therefore, perhaps some modest grounds for hoping that the worst impacts of Trump’s instincts in relation to green energy may be constrained, but there is no doubt that progress will be, at best, slowed down, and Trump has committed to “Drill baby drill” in relation to fossil fuels which need to stay in the ground.

As the tragic Valencia floods have reminded us, climate change threatens everyone, everywhere. Recent events in Florida have shown that this applies to Trump’s heartland as well, but he remains delusional that its effects are “weather”. The prospect of the most powerful man on the planet being a climate change denier is nothing short of terrifying. There is also no doubt that it is the poorest individuals within countries, and younger generations, who will suffer the most.

Sunak’s retreat from Net Zero will be disastrous for both consumers and the planet. Can Labour reverse it?
Also by Dorothy Smith

CLICK HERE TO DONATE TO OUR CROWDFUNDER

HELP US BECOME STRONGER SO THAT WE CAN CONTINUE TO DELIVER POWERFUL CITIZEN JOURNALISM!

Tags: Climate changeUSA
Previous Post

The US election – our writers review the result (part one)

Next Post

The US election, immigration and Ukraine – our writers review the result (part three)

Ross McNally

Ross McNally

Ross is a zoology graduate from Hove. He enjoys watching wildlife and following developments in the ecology of re-wilding. The history of radicalism and revolution in Britain and Europe is another interest.

Related Posts

Bags of discarded goods on a pavement
Environment

The broken circle, what nature knows about enough

by Oak Bear
5 September 2026
Brighton's Food Hall Kitchens
Community

A sustainable future : Changing the food system in Brighton

by James Joughin
4 September 2026
A hummingbird hawk-moth approaching a flower
Environment

The quiet world of a hummingbird hawk-moth

by Oak Bear
29 August 2026
Jihad amongst the rubble of his house
Human rights

The struggle to survive in Gaza – Jihad’s story

by Bruce Smeath
28 August 2026
Train to Busan screenshot
Culture

Train to Busan ten years on: zombie thriller that propelled the rise of Korean cinema

by Sarah Son
25 August 2026
Next Post
A gavel , scales and the American flag

The US election, immigration and Ukraine – our writers review the result (part three)

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

Afghanistan Animal welfare Art Autobiography Biodiversity Brighton and Hove Christmas Citizenship Climate change Conflict Cost of living Covid-19 Eastbourne East Sussex Energy Equality Finance Food and drink Gaza Gender rights Hastings International Women's Day Lewes Local elections Media Music Nature Newhaven NHS Pollution Refugees Rewilding Schools Sewage Species survival Sport Sunday read Ukraine USA Walking Water pollution West Sussex Women Worthing youth
Sussex Bylines

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Sussex and beyond.

Sussex Bylines is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Newsletter sign up
  • Letters
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Network Map
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2020-2026 Sussex Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9747

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
    • Democracy
    • Elections
    • Human rights
  • Environment
  • News
    • Brexit
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health and care
    • Home affairs
    • Transport
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Farming and fishing
    • Planning and housing
    • Science and technology
    • Trade
  • Community
    • Culture
    • History and heritage
    • Lifestyle
    • Sport and leisure
    • Travel and tourism
  • Sussex
  • World
    • Europe
  • Authors and editors

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2020-2026 Sussex Bylines. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9747